Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Long-Term Performance and Cost Savings of SEPCO SAS Air Seals: A Case Study

Fluid Sealing
SEPCO Long-Term Performance and Cost Savings of SEPCO SAS Air Seals A Case Study

Long-Term Performance and Cost Savings of SEPCO SAS Air Seals: A Case Study

By: SEPCO

Selecting the optimal sealing solution is essential for maximizing efficiency and minimizing operational costs in demanding industrial environments. This case study compares the SEPCO SAS Air Seal with a traditional contact seal (Seal “C”), highlighting performance, maintenance, and cost benefits based on real customer experiences.

Seal Technology Comparison

SEPCO SAS Air Seal

  • Type: Non-contact pneumatic seal
  • How It Works: Uses air to create a sealing barrier, reducing wear on shafts/sleeves
  • Key Features: Handles misalignment and movement, low air usage, lasts years without failure
  • Maintenance: Rarely needs parts; affordable replacements
  • Cost Benefits: Lower long-term costs due to durability and minimal upkeep
  • Special Note: FDA-compliant versions support clean-in-place for food and beverage industries

Seal “C” (Traditional Contact Seal)

  • Type: Contact air purge seal
  • How It Works: Air presses PTFE faces together, causing wear and potential shaft damage
  • Key Features: Limited movement tolerance, high air consumption
  • Maintenance: Needs annual rebuilds and costly part replacements
  • Cost Benefits: Higher costs due to frequent maintenance and shorter lifespan
  • Special Note: Prone to contamination; not suitable for clean-in-place processes

Real-World Results

  • Switching to SAS: One customer saved significantly by replacing Seal “C” with SAS, cutting maintenance costs. Seal “C” rebuild kits cost $1,200 for a 4.75-inch seal (~$250 per shaft inch).
  • Spice Industry: Seal “C” failed every six months due to high speeds, costing $18,000 to replace 16 seals in nine months. SAS improved durability and slashed expenses.
  • Food & Beverage: Seal “C” allowed contamination and couldn’t be cleaned in place, unlike SAS, which stayed clean and contamination-free without disassembly.

Why Choose SEPCO SAS Air Seal?

The SAS Air Seal outperforms Seal “C” with better reliability, lower maintenance, and superior cost-effectiveness. It reduces downtime, prevents contamination, and extends equipment life, making it ideal for demanding industries like food processing. Switching to SAS boosts efficiency and cuts ownership costs, offering a smart solution for challenging sealing needs.

Related Articles

Related Whitepapers

Gas Turbine Design for a Turbopump

Today, rockets are used to transport satellites and humans into space. These rockets use a cluster of liquid-propellant engines to generate thrust in the lower…

Development of a 5,000 lbf Open-Cycle Kerosene-Oxygen Turbopump

Design of a kerosene-oxygen turbopump utilizing a conventional open-cycle system architecture sized to power a 5,000-lbf thrust chamber is described. A conservative design approach tolerant…

SEEPEX Switch Performance Guarantee

Replace any brand progressive cavity pump with a SEEPEX maintain-in-place Smart Conveying Technology (SCT) pump and receive a 3-Year Performance Guarantee on wear parts! SEEPEX…

Limited Time Offer – Pump and Macerator Rebuilding Services

SEEPEX is excited to announce that, in response to high demand, they are extending their Factory Rebuild Program at their service center in Enon, OH!…