Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Long-Term Performance and Cost Savings of SEPCO SAS Air Seals: A Case Study

Fluid Sealing
SEPCO Long-Term Performance and Cost Savings of SEPCO SAS Air Seals A Case Study

Long-Term Performance and Cost Savings of SEPCO SAS Air Seals: A Case Study

By: SEPCO

Selecting the optimal sealing solution is essential for maximizing efficiency and minimizing operational costs in demanding industrial environments. This case study compares the SEPCO SAS Air Seal with a traditional contact seal (Seal “C”), highlighting performance, maintenance, and cost benefits based on real customer experiences.

Seal Technology Comparison

SEPCO SAS Air Seal

  • Type: Non-contact pneumatic seal
  • How It Works: Uses air to create a sealing barrier, reducing wear on shafts/sleeves
  • Key Features: Handles misalignment and movement, low air usage, lasts years without failure
  • Maintenance: Rarely needs parts; affordable replacements
  • Cost Benefits: Lower long-term costs due to durability and minimal upkeep
  • Special Note: FDA-compliant versions support clean-in-place for food and beverage industries

Seal “C” (Traditional Contact Seal)

  • Type: Contact air purge seal
  • How It Works: Air presses PTFE faces together, causing wear and potential shaft damage
  • Key Features: Limited movement tolerance, high air consumption
  • Maintenance: Needs annual rebuilds and costly part replacements
  • Cost Benefits: Higher costs due to frequent maintenance and shorter lifespan
  • Special Note: Prone to contamination; not suitable for clean-in-place processes

Real-World Results

  • Switching to SAS: One customer saved significantly by replacing Seal “C” with SAS, cutting maintenance costs. Seal “C” rebuild kits cost $1,200 for a 4.75-inch seal (~$250 per shaft inch).
  • Spice Industry: Seal “C” failed every six months due to high speeds, costing $18,000 to replace 16 seals in nine months. SAS improved durability and slashed expenses.
  • Food & Beverage: Seal “C” allowed contamination and couldn’t be cleaned in place, unlike SAS, which stayed clean and contamination-free without disassembly.

Why Choose SEPCO SAS Air Seal?

The SAS Air Seal outperforms Seal “C” with better reliability, lower maintenance, and superior cost-effectiveness. It reduces downtime, prevents contamination, and extends equipment life, making it ideal for demanding industries like food processing. Switching to SAS boosts efficiency and cuts ownership costs, offering a smart solution for challenging sealing needs.

Related Articles

Related Whitepapers

Torque Measurement Precision: Why the Overload vs. Overrange Distinction Matters for Quality Control

Why properly understanding and differentiating between overload and overrange helps to maintain the accuracy and longevity of the torque meter. Two easily overlooked, yet extremely…

Implementing Predictive and Prescriptive Digital Maintenance Technologies for Rotating Equipment

Business and operations systems are becoming increasingly integrated in the digital era. With accessible data and information, enhancing the business value of plants that utilize…

Building a Centrifugal Pump Digital Twin for a Chemical Plant

A digital twin represents a physical asset and its function; it contains intelligence to evaluate static and real-time data. Chemical refining plants are asset intensive…

Autonomous Fontan pump: Computational feasibility study

A double-inlet, double-outlet rotary pump was designed to augment Fontan flow through the total cavopulmonary connection. Pump power is supplied by a systemic arterial shunt…