Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Types of Fluoroelastomers Seals for Pump Users: Explained

Picture of Fluoroelastomers Seals

Types of Fluoroelastomers Seals for Pump Users: Explained

Aggressive pumping environments can be problematic for pump engineers. On the one hand it’s impossible to design the pump to be resistant to every kind of chemical, while on the other, the tendency is to either over specify a perfluoroelastomer to cover all eventualities or select a elastomer with mid-range chemical resistance in the hope this will cover most applications.

Picture of Fluoroelastomers Seals

Over recent years the elastomer industry has been systematically improving pump sealing performance – fine tuning temperature, chemical and mechanical properties in some areas and defining new benchmarks in others. As a result it has never been easier to match the seal to the pumping environment. The wide variety of sealing

options can, however, make it more difficult to select the correct seal; a case of too much choice, perhaps.  With this in mind we offer the pump engineer a guide to recent development in fluoroelastomer technology.

Often referred to as FKM, fluoroelastomer seals are normally used in high temperature and aggressive fluid environments containing oils, aromatic hydrocarbons and

gasoline.  They sit between Hydrogenated Nitrile Butadiene Rubber (HNBR) at the lower end in terms of their temperature and chemical resistance and perfluoroelastomers at the top end of the scale. Within the range of fluoroelastomers themselves, there are differences – so it is important to note that: Not all Fluoroelastomers Are The Same. The challenge to the pump engineer is understanding the options and variables involved in selecting an FKM sealing material.

Know your Fluoroelastomer

There are five main types of FKMs, determined by the types of monomers used to produce the fluoroelastomer as defined by ASTM D1418

. These include Vinylidene Fluoride (VF2), Hexafluoropropylene (HFP),  Tetrafluoroethylene (TFE), Perfluoromethylvinylether (PMVE). The combination of monomers determines the properties of the FKM.

Type 1: VF2 + HFP (copolymer / dipolymer), bisphenol cured, good all-round properties and the most common FKM.

Type 2: VF2 + HFP + TFE (terpolymer), bisphenol cured, this elastomer has higher heat resistance and improved chemical resistance to aromatic and low molecular weight hydrocarbons over type 1 FKMs.

Type 3: VF2 + TFE + PMVE  (terpolymer) peroxide cured, this elastomer widens the elastomer’s temperature capability enabling lower temperature flexibility.    Older grades have a glass transition of -30°C while newer technology with longer ether containing pendent groups remains flexible to -40°C.

Type 4: VF2 + Propylene + TFE (terpolymer) bisphenol cured, this elastomer has higher resistance to bases, but is more susceptible to swelling in hydrocarbons such as oil and automotive fuels.  These types of polymers are rarely found in applications outside of the automotive market.

Type 5:  VF2 + HFP + TFE + PMVE and Ethylene (pentapolymer), peroxide-cured, this elastomer has improved base resistance compared to dipolymer type 1 FKMs. Ethylene sequenced in the polymer backbone inhibits attack by bases.   Like type 4 FKMs, type 5 FKMs are rarely found outside of speciality applications in the automotive industry.

As table 1 shows FKMs are produced using different curing (or crosslinking) mechanisms, specifically, bisphenol, ionic and peroxide cure. The curing mechanism is important to the elastomer’s temperature and chemical resistance and mechanical properties.
Picture of Fluoroelastomers Seals 

VF2 =  Vinylidene Fluoride / CH2=CF2

HFP = Hexafluoropropylene / CF2=CF-CF3

TFE = Tetrafluoroethylene / CF2=CF2

PMVE = Perfluoromethylvinylether / CF2=CF-OCF3


E = Ethylene / CH2=CH2

P = Propylene / CH2=CH-CH3

CSM = Cure Site Monomer, Usually  Iodine or Bromine

FKM = Fluoroelastomer

Table 1 Illustrates the monomers composition of various FKM types.  Note that performance of a fluorinated elastomer can vary dramatically based on monomer composition, monomer ratios, monomer sequence, cure system, polymer molecular weight, & fillers.

There are two types of curing mechanism: E2 and E1. E2 involves the elimination of a hydrogen atom and its adjacent fluorine to create a crosslink site for the VF2 elastomers, bisphenol cure is an example of this. E1 is a free radical reaction, typically involving a cure site monomer (CSM) where iodine or bromine is substituted by a peroxide radical.

The most common FKM product that is often cited in fluid resistance guides is the copolymer or type 1 FKM.  While it is popular, it does not represent the best technology and enhanced properties available. As the table shows the pump engineer can choose from various types of FKM, cure systems, and monomers.

As a case in point, consider the comparison of a copolymer bisphenol cured FKM and a peroxide cured terpolymer FKM.  Although the volume swell in oil is similar, there is a significant difference in steam resistance properties. In addition, the peroxide cured terpolymer will also be more resistant to alkaline environments and corrosion inhibitors.  Bisphenol cured FKMs are susceptible to attack by high temperature water and steam.

This brief overview of FKM materials has shown that by taking a closer look at the composition of the elastomer, and its curing mechanism, the pump engineer is able to select a sealing material better suited to the pumping application. In critical applications, it is important for the engineer to ask questions of their supplier and so make the optimum selection from the available materials to meet the technical requirements. Hopefully this overview will provide a useful starting point for the discussion. If you would like more information, please visit:


Picture of Steve Jagels

Steve Jagels is a Business Development Manager for Precision Polymer Engineering, A Unit of IDEX Corporation.  He has worked in the high performance seal and elastomer industry for fourteen years specializing in fluoroelastomer and perfluoroelastomer technology.  Steve is a member of SAE, American Chemical Society, and Energy Rubber Group.  He has served in a variety of technical and business roles in his career.   Steve is a alum of Tulane University and the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School.   He may be reached at 1-856-535-8181 or

Related Articles

DFT Achieving Success in Chemical Processing

Achieving Success in Chemical Processing

Facility: Large Chemical Facility Southern, USA Application Problem: Chemical Cooling Tower Service Water Loop System Solution: DFT® Model ALC® Check Valve 10”…

Related Whitepapers

Climate Control and Extra Cargo Space: a Commercial Facility Case Study

The Armstrong Design Assist service reduced the required floor space for hvac equipment. The ipc 11550, delivered as part of a packaged system, automates the…

Upside Down Condos [Case Study]

This condo tower (324 units on 13 floors) had completed a previous retrofit that unfortunately left the variable speed pumps operating in a fixed mode…

Ras Al Khaimah saves 20% energy and 12% OPEX in wastewater pumping system

RAKWA is the RAK wastewater agency responsible for designing, building, operating, and maintaining all the public wastewater systems. Ras Al Khaimah—known as RAK—is the northernmost…

Intelligent Pumps Exceed Savings Estimates (Commercial Facility Installation Casestudy)

Design Envelope 6800 boosters reduced energy consumption by 76% compared to previous boosters, resulting in annual cost savings of $4,400 per system. Background The Heron’s…


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *