Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

To Coat or Not to Coat – Part 1

Industry News
chesterton coatings

To Coat or Not to Coat – Part 1

Over the next several months I hope to address the topic of coatings and linings for pumps and pump systems within the process industries.  Way back in the 1948 Alexey J. Stepanoff wrote in Centrifugal and Axial Flow Pumps: Theory, Design, and Application that, “While failure of seals or bearings may be immediately apparent, the deterioration in pump hydraulics is unlikely to be obvious.  This can have many sources, chemical erosion, physical abrasion, deposition.  The use of glass or resin coatings can help to increase and maintain a good hydraulic efficiency over a long period of time, and for larger pumps many users specify these coatings as standard.  Improvements in efficiency of 2-3% are typical.  This is a practice that should be encouraged.”  Since that time arguments have gone back and forth on the pros and cons, risk and rewards of to coat or not to coat. To paraphrase William Shakespeare, “Whether ’tis nobler in the process industry to suffer premature pump failure, system disruption and increased maintenance costs or to take action against known factors and, by opposing them, to face unplanned shut down no more”.

Pump suppliers have often taken a skeptical view of the value of a coating while pump owners have often relied on coatings to prolong service life in process conditions such as chemically reactive solutions and/or abrasive slurries.  Can a coating negatively impact pump performance?  Can a coating promote extended service life?  The reality, as one would expect, lies in the middle ground and, it is this author’s position that, when properly evaluated, selected and installed a coating can provide valuable benefits such as extended MTBR, reduced operational expenses, and lower overall life cycle costs.  What then should a “user” consider when evaluating the pros and cons of a coating option for a pump?  First a thorough understanding of the pump manufacturer’s pump curves, pump process conditions including but not limited to; flow/velocity, process media (chemicals present in their concentrations) , total suspended solids (density, % presence, particle size range and shape) and operational temperature ranges (high and low).

A coating should be able to effectively protect a pump element (volute, impellor, back plate, suction spool, discharge, etc) for a period of time understood and agreed upon by the user.  The coating manufacturer/supplier should be able to recommend a product based on the operating parameters defined by the user.  The user needs to understand that any coating is a surface treatment only, and that once a coating is installed it starts a progressive degradation process.  At first this process is imperceptible but over time the coating breaks down and two things start to happen.  First the coating enters the process stream, either in a solution or in a suspended solid state, and the process owner needs to understand how that can impact his process.  In a wastewater pump a coating breaking down and entering the process flow may not be a significant issue.  This may not be the case in a pharmaceutical or food process.   The second thing that starts to happen is that the pump metallurgy is now exposed to the process conditions and accelerated attack can occur at these points leading to premature system upset.  Understanding the two stages of breakdown and what one can do in the evaluation, selection and installation stages of pump coatings systems is where the time needs to be spent.

In the next installment I will address some of the various coatings available, and how each can evaluated to offer value to the operational reliability and efficiency of the pump.   I welcome any feedback and look forward to contributing in this forum.

To contact me, please email me at

About the Author

Stephen Bowditch is the Global Product Line Manager for the A. W. Chesterton Companies ARC Composite Coatings based in Groveland, Massachusetts, USA.  He has been employed at Chesterton for 24 years and is a NACE CIP Level 3 inspector, and a SSPC Corrosion Specialist.

Related Articles

Related Whitepapers

True-turbine Design Enhances Energy Recovery and CO2 Reduction

In the oil and gas industry, hydraulic power recovery turbines (HPRTs) capture energy in hydrocrackers that would otherwise be wasted to efficiently drive a charge…

5 Steps for Reliable Packing Performance

These guidelines will help extend packing life and reduce downtime. No shortcuts should be taken if a plant wants to achieve reliable compression packing performance.…

Pressure Testing of DFT® Check Valves [Infographic]

All DFT Check Valves undergo rigorous tests to ensure they meet industry quality requirements. Check out this handy infographic to learn about their diligent testing.

Bearing Protection Best Practices

Electro Static Technology (EST, AEGIS®) guarantees that AC induction motor bearings will not fail from electrical fluting damage when AEGIS Shaft Grounding Rings have been…


2 responses to “To Coat or Not to Coat – Part 1”

  1. […] For more information on coatings, please read the series by Steve Bowditch, “To Coat or Not to Coat.” […]

  2. […] operational efficiency as part of the pumping system, especially when used in conjunction with pump coatings. The issue, however, is that not all coatings are created equal – so the correct […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join the #PumpTalk Community

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Empowering Pumps & Equipment, 2205-C 7th Street, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35401, You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact