Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Realizable Torque Measurement Accuracy vs Torque Sensor Specifications

Pumps & Operations
S.Himmelstein Realizable Torque Measurement Accuracy vs Torque Sensor Specifications

Realizable Torque Measurement Accuracy vs Torque Sensor Specifications

By definition, Measurement Accuracy is the degree to which a measurement conforms to the actual torque value. Using the maker’s specification to predict measurement accuracy is only valid when the test conditions and the calibration conditions are identical. If they are not, field results will fall short of published Cal Laboratory performance.

Himmelstein Torque Sensors undergo NVLAP Accredited (Lab Code 200487-1) Calibrations conforming to ISO/IEC 17025:2017. Here are some of the conditions that exist during calibration.

  • The laboratory is held at a constant temperature
  • No significant temperature gradients exist in the Test Item
  • No significant temperature gradients exist in the Calibration Stand or Connecting Shafts
  • No significant extraneous loads are applied to the Test Item.
  • The Test Item and all Instrumentation are thoroughly warmed up before calibration
  • Applied calibration loads are static and precisely known
  • Transient torque effects are damped and allowed to decay before recording data

S.Himmelstein Realizable Torque Measurement Accuracy vs Torque Sensor SpecificationsIn real world testing it’s virtually impossible to replicate these and other laboratory conditions. Matters are exacerbated during rotating torque measurements. During rotation there are power producing and power absorbing elements in the drive train. Because they have losses, they generate heat which causes the temperature to rise, and more importantly, causes temperature gradients. Power producers and absorbers have poles, pistons, gears, etc. that generate periodic torque variations which, in turn, can excite torsional resonances (more info). Because of these factors as well as the practical inability to minimize field misalignments and extraneous loads and to provide adequate stabilization, field test conditions never duplicate those in the calibration laboratory.

As a result, it’s not possible to specify the accuracy of field measurements. No responsible, knowledgeable Sensor Manufacturer does. What is done is to provide, and guarantee, sensor response understated, relevant conditions. Those specifications then permit a user to compare the performance of different products.

To satisfy accuracy requirements and account for unknown test conditions, there is a growing consensus to use a sensor whose Combined Error¹ is 25% or less than the desired accuracy. When applied to a Himmelstein sensor, that ratio will virtually always result in meeting or exceeding the accuracy goal. The probability of meeting the accuracy goal is reduced when the ratio is more than 25%.

Europeans have defined a parameter called “Accuracy Class²”, a combination of 4 common specifications. However, like individual parameter specifications it’s useful for comparing sensor models; it can’t predict the accuracy of field measurements. Recent Himmelstein products specify “Accuracy Class”, as defined in Europe, for our European customers.

  1. Combined Error is the greatest deviation of ascending and descending calibration points (Himmelstein uses 21) from the sensors’ Best Fit Line. It includes the effects of Non-Linearity, Hysteresis, and Non-Return to Zero. It is expressed as a percent of full scale.
  2. Accuracy Class is the greatest of Combined Error, Repeatability, Zero Drift and Span Drif t over 10 °C. It is expressed as a percent of full scale.

Related Articles

Related Whitepapers

Design Optimization of Jet Fuel Pump for Aviation

Jet fuel pumps play a critical role in the safe and efficient operation of commercial aviation. The performance and reliability of these pumps directly impact…

The Cost Of Downtime In Manufacturing [Infographic]

Downtime can be the most expensive element of any manufacturing operation. Here are some important facts and tips you should know to cut down on…

AFT Fathom used to Model Central Heating Cycle of a State-of-the-art Combined Heat and Power Plant

Kerem Algüzey, design engineer at ENKA Insaat ve Sanayi A.S., used AFT Fathom to simulate the central heating cycle to inform the design of the…

Driving Energy Savings a Commercial Facility Energy Upgrade Project

Upgrading to Design Envelope pumps helped GAC save energy costs of 20,000 AED in the first year. Armstrong’s Pump Manager service provides reports and notifications…


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *