Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Severe Service Valves in the Chemical Industry (Part 3)

CGIS
CGIS

Severe Service Valves in the Chemical Industry (Part 3)

Author: CGIS (CG Industrial Specialties)

For isolation valves we have far less agreement or easy to accept definitions of SSVs. Table 2 provides some reasonable thresholds, although it is admitted, we are still debating and discussing these, and it appears we may need a combination of thresholds to occur in order to qualify as severe. For example, if we use the temperature threshold of 260 °C – the upper useable limit of fluorocarbons – this eliminates one of the world’s best seat material options and we are forced into metal seats which are far more challenging to use and produce “tight” shut-off isolation performance. “Tight” itself needs further definition and objective measurements and is in fact being defined by MSS.

CGIS

Table 2. Determining Factors for Severe Service Isolation Valves (SSIVs)

 

One significant lack in most isolation valve datasheets is a clear expectation of isolation performance. For many in the industry, we blindly use FCI 70.2 as the performance level. You will see Class V or Class VI listed frequently. These classes do offer a measurement for “allowable” leak rate. The anomaly is that the title of the Standard is Allowable Leak Rate for Control Valves. Control valves can leak because they should not be used as isolation valves, and SSIVs should not.

The valve industry is only just now catching up with the demands of highest performance valves and providing us with better tools that have been available in the past. For instance, we currently don’t have an industry Standard to source an isolation valve performance that doesn’t allow some passing (seat leakage). One can reference a valve test Standard such as API 598 or ISO 5208 and add a required performance statement like “valve seat testing to API 598 resilient seat”, but that eliminates metal seated valves from selection even though some metal seated valves are capable of the tightest isolation. For now, the most common isolation valve performance Standard in North America is FCI 70.2, yet it has no category for zero seat leakage.

An example of a Severe Service Isolation Valve (SSIV) could appear as a process isolation requirement to provide better than FCI 70.2 Class V shut-off for two years continuous service. A typical application for this example could be a high pressure steam boiler drain. This is because a drain valve contains the energy inside the boiler until it is time to empty it and while isolating the steam, any passing (leakage) will lead to loss of efficiency, wasted resources (fuel, demineralized water) and that leakage will lead to increased seat wear and even more leakage.

 

Read Part 4 – Selecting Valves When Data is Missing

Related Articles

Related Whitepapers

What is Water Hammer and Why It Is Important to Prevent?

Water hammer (or hydraulic shock) is the momentary increase in pressure inside a pipe caused by a sudden change of direction or velocity of the…

Five Reasons To Choose A Bearingless Torque Sensor

Benefits that improve your torque measurements Best real-world accuracy Highest Overload Highest Overrange

Advanced Sealing and Condition Monitoring Strategies In Water and Wastewater Plants

Introduction As a plant/maintenance manager or reliability engineer for a water or wastewater facility, you want to know about the best technologies to help your…

Downthrust Measurement in Vertical Pumps Prevents Failure: The Benefits of Measuring Axial Force in Real-Time

“Himmelstein’s Thrustmeter has proven to be accurate and repeatable, which are two of the main things that define quality in an instrument. It’s been a…

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *